Billy Florence Chastises Scott Larsen Internet Critic
Scott Larsen the self alleged Quixtar expert (actually a moral midget and mental moron) has been chastised again for lying. Scott assaulted the integrity of Billy Florence by claiming Billy misrepresented the earnings potential of the Quixtar plan. Scott Larsen reviewed the business plan numbers and proved his ignorance of the compensation plan fundamentals. Scott Larsen also made general math level calculation errors in his review. (Qrush told you the guy was stupid) By combining his ignorance and mathematical errors, Scott Larsen concluded that Billy Florence has no integrity. :) How did Scott become an engineer with such pathetic mathematical and reasoning ability? Here is just a portion of Scott’s embarrassing retraction article and as always, Qrush’s comments in red.
I had misunderstood the 2500 PV side volume rule to apply to all platinum's but after rereading the compendium. I did learn that after two qualifying legs that you don't need the side volume to get the 4% leadership bonus. That was my "bad" I admit.
Scott that was real “Bad.” You attacked a man’s character and integrity based on your total ignorance of a Quixtar foundational concept, the 4% leadership bonus. Where is the apology for this? What an arrogant fool. Mistake #1
Another glaring mistake was a calculation of the 4% leadership bonus. I don't know how I did it but I did calculate incorrectly the leadership bonus and I cannot recreate where I made the mistake.
Qrush knows how you did it. You are a mathematically deficient person posing as an expert. You cannot recreate the numbers because you probably pulled them out of thin air to begin with. Two mistakes in the alleged consumer advocates article? Mistake #2
I had another mistake where I misquoted his $56,000 income representation over a 2+ year period as being on a year basis. Another bad on my part.
Scott, you are having a tough time doing 5th grade math. Do you not review your articles before publishing this garbage? Perhaps you ought to stick to simpler concepts like counting to ten, tying your shoes, and wiping your own arse. :) Three mistakes in the wannabe consumer advocate's article?? Mistake #3
Scott totally blew his expert facade and displayed his ignorance of how the 4% bonus works and then combined this error with general education level math errors thereby deducing that Billy Florence lacks integrity. Billy Florence sent Scott a letter spelling out Scott’s errors and ignorance in detail. Scott changed the article but refused to issue an apology for his inconceivable errors. Here is Scott Larsen describing his reasoning for not issuing an apology.
I would consider an apology if he had brought the issue to my attention a year ago, when he surely had seen the page and could have taken action to set the record straight then. Apparently he did not care at the time to have the record set straight.
In the strange mind of Scott Larsen, he somehow feels there is a statute of limitations on apologies. Since Scott’s article was up for more than one year he refuses to offer an apology to Billy Florence, claiming Billy should have read Scott’s site within the year to ensure the morons accuracy. Scott you made three mistakes in the course of one article. Qrush hates to break the news to Scott, but diamonds probably have better things to do with their time than to teach know nothing critics like Scott the Quixtar basics. Plus at the rate of three mistakes per article it would take years to correct all the worthless articles you have published. Exactly how are you being a consumer advocate here? A better term would be a Scott Larsen Ignorant Deceiver.
Scott’s whole site appears to be made up of hate filled diatribe, rumors, lies, innuendo, mathematical errors and negative opinions. How can Scott pretend to be an expert on the Quixtar business commenting on sophisticated topics like, FTC legal requirements, Product Cost per Use (this would require math :), Attorney General Regulations, Economic Issues and Pyramid law when he doesn’t even understand how the 4% bonus works or perform basic mathematical functions? What is up with that? Scott Larsen proves the theory that any fool with a computer can spew lies on the internet. Just as Bo Short proved any fool using a computer could act like he owned a business. Scott Larsen has no results, nor apparently any facts, nor any inherent sense of honor.
Some of Qrush’s critics accuse me of being like Scott Larsen and having no credibility. Qrush does not agree for various reasons, but here is the major one. Qrush is not an evil, hateful, spiteful person pretending to be a legitimate critic. Qrush is a free enterpriser, encourager and optimist pretending to be like Scott to teach him a lesson. Qrush is modeling Scott Larsen’s behavior to teach him and others that when you sling mud all you do is dig yourself in a hole. Qrush has stated repeatedly that I will exit the field when Scott Larsen has had enough of the game. If someone is turned off by Qrush it is only because you don’t understand parody, satire or the heinous activities of Scott Larsen.
Many of my fans have asked what they can do to contribute to Qrush’s and the IBO’s cause. Qrush thanks my reader audience in advance and will spell out how you can help. First, start a blog and start sharing the truth about Quixtar, Scott Larsen and the diamonds. Second, if you have any information on our “wonder wimp” liar then please email me and share your story. We must expose Scott Larsen to the facts of his shattered credibility, diabolical actions and wasted life. Qrush over and out.
The above statements are based on my opinions and experiences and a very low quality article by Scott Larsen. Qrush is merely using his free speech to mentor a broken little man who has lost his way.
I had misunderstood the 2500 PV side volume rule to apply to all platinum's but after rereading the compendium. I did learn that after two qualifying legs that you don't need the side volume to get the 4% leadership bonus. That was my "bad" I admit.
Scott that was real “Bad.” You attacked a man’s character and integrity based on your total ignorance of a Quixtar foundational concept, the 4% leadership bonus. Where is the apology for this? What an arrogant fool. Mistake #1
Another glaring mistake was a calculation of the 4% leadership bonus. I don't know how I did it but I did calculate incorrectly the leadership bonus and I cannot recreate where I made the mistake.
Qrush knows how you did it. You are a mathematically deficient person posing as an expert. You cannot recreate the numbers because you probably pulled them out of thin air to begin with. Two mistakes in the alleged consumer advocates article? Mistake #2
I had another mistake where I misquoted his $56,000 income representation over a 2+ year period as being on a year basis. Another bad on my part.
Scott, you are having a tough time doing 5th grade math. Do you not review your articles before publishing this garbage? Perhaps you ought to stick to simpler concepts like counting to ten, tying your shoes, and wiping your own arse. :) Three mistakes in the wannabe consumer advocate's article?? Mistake #3
Scott totally blew his expert facade and displayed his ignorance of how the 4% bonus works and then combined this error with general education level math errors thereby deducing that Billy Florence lacks integrity. Billy Florence sent Scott a letter spelling out Scott’s errors and ignorance in detail. Scott changed the article but refused to issue an apology for his inconceivable errors. Here is Scott Larsen describing his reasoning for not issuing an apology.
I would consider an apology if he had brought the issue to my attention a year ago, when he surely had seen the page and could have taken action to set the record straight then. Apparently he did not care at the time to have the record set straight.
In the strange mind of Scott Larsen, he somehow feels there is a statute of limitations on apologies. Since Scott’s article was up for more than one year he refuses to offer an apology to Billy Florence, claiming Billy should have read Scott’s site within the year to ensure the morons accuracy. Scott you made three mistakes in the course of one article. Qrush hates to break the news to Scott, but diamonds probably have better things to do with their time than to teach know nothing critics like Scott the Quixtar basics. Plus at the rate of three mistakes per article it would take years to correct all the worthless articles you have published. Exactly how are you being a consumer advocate here? A better term would be a Scott Larsen Ignorant Deceiver.
Scott’s whole site appears to be made up of hate filled diatribe, rumors, lies, innuendo, mathematical errors and negative opinions. How can Scott pretend to be an expert on the Quixtar business commenting on sophisticated topics like, FTC legal requirements, Product Cost per Use (this would require math :), Attorney General Regulations, Economic Issues and Pyramid law when he doesn’t even understand how the 4% bonus works or perform basic mathematical functions? What is up with that? Scott Larsen proves the theory that any fool with a computer can spew lies on the internet. Just as Bo Short proved any fool using a computer could act like he owned a business. Scott Larsen has no results, nor apparently any facts, nor any inherent sense of honor.
Some of Qrush’s critics accuse me of being like Scott Larsen and having no credibility. Qrush does not agree for various reasons, but here is the major one. Qrush is not an evil, hateful, spiteful person pretending to be a legitimate critic. Qrush is a free enterpriser, encourager and optimist pretending to be like Scott to teach him a lesson. Qrush is modeling Scott Larsen’s behavior to teach him and others that when you sling mud all you do is dig yourself in a hole. Qrush has stated repeatedly that I will exit the field when Scott Larsen has had enough of the game. If someone is turned off by Qrush it is only because you don’t understand parody, satire or the heinous activities of Scott Larsen.
Many of my fans have asked what they can do to contribute to Qrush’s and the IBO’s cause. Qrush thanks my reader audience in advance and will spell out how you can help. First, start a blog and start sharing the truth about Quixtar, Scott Larsen and the diamonds. Second, if you have any information on our “wonder wimp” liar then please email me and share your story. We must expose Scott Larsen to the facts of his shattered credibility, diabolical actions and wasted life. Qrush over and out.
The above statements are based on my opinions and experiences and a very low quality article by Scott Larsen. Qrush is merely using his free speech to mentor a broken little man who has lost his way.
posted by Quixtar QRush at 7:57 AM
<< Home